Replace the two parallel odds/Elo mechanisms with one model: every strength
source (raw Elo, projected wins, projected table points, futures odds) converts
to an Elo, those blend by weight into a single Elo, and that one Elo feeds every
simulator. This supersedes the earlier source-priority + per-match probability
blend approach.
Resolution (app/services/simulations/input-policy.ts):
- SimulatorInputPolicy gains baseEloPriority (order among the substitutable base
sources: raw Elo / projected wins / projected table points) and oddsWeight
(0–1). resolveSourceElos/resolveRatings now compute baseElo, derive an
odds Elo via convertFuturesToElo, and blend: 0 = base only, 1 = futures
override, between = weighted blend (method "blend").
- Drops the odds-inclusive sourceEloPriority and the prefersFuturesOdds helper.
Simulators consume the single resolved Elo:
- UCL, World Cup, NCAA Football, MLB drop their separate normalized-odds signal,
convertFuturesToElo calls, and per-match probability blend; they read the
resolved sourceElo (preserving each sim's hardcoded fallback Elo table). The
optional SimulationContext oddsWeight plumbing (types.ts/runner.ts) is removed.
- UCL is routed through the central blend (requiredInputs sourceElo, derivable
from sourceOdds) so any entered Elo and futures blend uniformly.
- College hockey already blends odds into Elo internally (and uses NPI rank the
central resolver can't), so its central oddsWeight is set to 0 to avoid
double-counting; the simulator is unchanged.
Manifest: per-profile oddsWeight defaults (World Cup/UCL/MLB 0.3, NCAA FB 0.4,
college hockey 0; global default 0.3).
UI: the Input Policy card exposes one "Futures vs. Elo — Odds Blend Weight"
control; the /admin/simulators inventory badge shows the effective blend
("Elo only" / "NN% blend" / "overrides Elo") with the odds participant count.
Tests: input-policy blend math (0/0.5/1) for Elo and ratings, baseEloPriority
and oddsWeight parsing/clamping, manifest per-profile weights; obsolete
source-priority and oddsWeight-context tests removed/replaced.
Note: this intentionally shifts the calibrated EV outputs of the four sims that
previously blended at the probability level (accepted in design discussion).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01QhNeB7gN6VKene7sdbBVQT
301 lines
14 KiB
TypeScript
301 lines
14 KiB
TypeScript
import { describe, expect, it } from "vitest";
|
|
import {
|
|
getSimulatorInputPolicy,
|
|
resolveRatings,
|
|
resolveSourceElos,
|
|
DEFAULT_BASE_ELO_PRIORITY,
|
|
} from "../input-policy";
|
|
import type { SimulatorManifestProfile } from "../manifest";
|
|
|
|
const profile = {
|
|
derivableInputs: { sourceElo: ["projectedWins", "sourceOdds"] },
|
|
} as Pick<SimulatorManifestProfile, "derivableInputs">;
|
|
|
|
const tablePointsProfile = {
|
|
derivableInputs: { sourceElo: ["projectedTablePoints"] },
|
|
} as Pick<SimulatorManifestProfile, "derivableInputs">;
|
|
|
|
describe("simulator input policy", () => {
|
|
it("keeps direct Elo ahead of derived values", () => {
|
|
const resolved = resolveSourceElos(
|
|
[{ participantId: "team-1", sourceElo: 1600, rating: null, sourceOdds: 2000, projectedWins: 20, projectedTablePoints: null }],
|
|
profile,
|
|
{ seasonGames: 82 }
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
expect(resolved.get("team-1")).toMatchObject({ sourceElo: 1600, method: "direct" });
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("derives Elo from projected wins when Elo is missing", () => {
|
|
const resolved = resolveSourceElos(
|
|
[{ participantId: "team-1", sourceElo: null, rating: null, sourceOdds: null, projectedWins: 60, projectedTablePoints: null }],
|
|
profile,
|
|
{ seasonGames: 82, parityFactor: 400 }
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
expect(resolved.get("team-1")?.method).toBe("projectedWins");
|
|
expect(resolved.get("team-1")?.sourceElo).toBeGreaterThan(1500);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("uses parityFactor as the projected table points to Elo spread", () => {
|
|
const input = {
|
|
participantId: "team-1",
|
|
sourceElo: null,
|
|
rating: null,
|
|
sourceOdds: null,
|
|
projectedWins: null,
|
|
projectedTablePoints: 76,
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
const compressed = resolveSourceElos([input], tablePointsProfile, {
|
|
seasonGames: 38,
|
|
parityFactor: 250,
|
|
});
|
|
const wider = resolveSourceElos([input], tablePointsProfile, {
|
|
seasonGames: 38,
|
|
parityFactor: 1000,
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
expect(compressed.get("team-1")?.sourceElo).toBeLessThan(wider.get("team-1")?.sourceElo ?? 0);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("blocks missing Elo unless a fallback strategy is configured", () => {
|
|
const inputs = [{ participantId: "team-1", sourceElo: null, rating: null, sourceOdds: null, projectedWins: null, projectedTablePoints: null }];
|
|
|
|
expect(resolveSourceElos(inputs, profile, {}).has("team-1")).toBe(false);
|
|
expect(resolveSourceElos(inputs, profile, {
|
|
inputPolicy: { missingEloStrategy: "fallbackElo", fallbackElo: 1375 },
|
|
}).get("team-1")).toMatchObject({ sourceElo: 1375, method: "fallbackElo" });
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("supports worst-known-minus tail fallback", () => {
|
|
const resolved = resolveSourceElos(
|
|
[
|
|
{ participantId: "known-1", sourceElo: 1500, rating: null, sourceOdds: null, projectedWins: null, projectedTablePoints: null },
|
|
{ participantId: "known-2", sourceElo: 1430, rating: null, sourceOdds: null, projectedWins: null, projectedTablePoints: null },
|
|
{ participantId: "tail", sourceElo: null, rating: null, sourceOdds: null, projectedWins: null, projectedTablePoints: null },
|
|
],
|
|
profile,
|
|
{ inputPolicy: { missingEloStrategy: "worstKnownMinus", fallbackEloDelta: 30 } }
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
expect(resolved.get("tail")).toMatchObject({ sourceElo: 1400, method: "worstKnownMinus" });
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("derives Elo from futures odds when no direct Elo is present", () => {
|
|
const resolved = resolveSourceElos(
|
|
[
|
|
{ participantId: "favorite", sourceElo: null, rating: null, sourceOdds: 300, projectedWins: null, projectedTablePoints: null },
|
|
{ participantId: "longshot", sourceElo: null, rating: null, sourceOdds: 20000, projectedWins: null, projectedTablePoints: null },
|
|
],
|
|
profile,
|
|
{}
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
expect(resolved.get("favorite")?.method).toBe("sourceOdds");
|
|
expect(resolved.get("longshot")?.method).toBe("sourceOdds");
|
|
expect(resolved.get("favorite")?.sourceElo).toBeGreaterThan(resolved.get("longshot")?.sourceElo ?? Infinity);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("ignores a lone sourceOdds participant rather than assigning a flat Elo", () => {
|
|
const inputs = [
|
|
{ participantId: "only", sourceElo: null, rating: null, sourceOdds: 300, projectedWins: null, projectedTablePoints: null },
|
|
];
|
|
|
|
// Needs at least 2 odds to derive a spread; with block strategy it stays unresolved.
|
|
expect(resolveSourceElos(inputs, profile, {}).has("only")).toBe(false);
|
|
|
|
// With a fallback strategy it resolves via that method, not "sourceOdds".
|
|
expect(
|
|
resolveSourceElos(inputs, profile, {
|
|
inputPolicy: { missingEloStrategy: "fallbackElo", fallbackElo: 1400 },
|
|
}).get("only")
|
|
).toMatchObject({ sourceElo: 1400, method: "fallbackElo" });
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("derives Elo from odds once a prior direct Elo has been cleared", () => {
|
|
// Regression: after entering futures odds the simulator inputs row keeps
|
|
// sourceOdds but has its sourceElo nulled. The resolver must pick "sourceOdds",
|
|
// not resurrect a "direct" Elo.
|
|
const resolved = resolveSourceElos(
|
|
[
|
|
{ participantId: "favorite", sourceElo: null, rating: null, sourceOdds: 300, projectedWins: null, projectedTablePoints: null },
|
|
{ participantId: "longshot", sourceElo: null, rating: null, sourceOdds: 20000, projectedWins: null, projectedTablePoints: null },
|
|
],
|
|
profile,
|
|
{}
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
expect(resolved.get("favorite")?.method).toBe("sourceOdds");
|
|
expect(resolved.get("longshot")?.method).toBe("sourceOdds");
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("derives ratings from futures odds when the profile allows it", () => {
|
|
const resolved = resolveRatings(
|
|
[
|
|
{ participantId: "favorite", sourceElo: null, rating: null, sourceOdds: 300, projectedWins: null, projectedTablePoints: null },
|
|
{ participantId: "longshot", sourceElo: null, rating: null, sourceOdds: 20000, projectedWins: null, projectedTablePoints: null },
|
|
],
|
|
{ derivableInputs: { rating: ["sourceOdds"] } },
|
|
{ inputPolicy: { ratingMin: -10, ratingMax: 35 } }
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
expect(resolved.get("favorite")?.method).toBe("sourceOdds");
|
|
expect(resolved.get("longshot")?.method).toBe("sourceOdds");
|
|
expect(resolved.get("favorite")?.rating).toBeGreaterThan(resolved.get("longshot")?.rating ?? 999);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("blocks missing ratings unless a rating fallback strategy is configured", () => {
|
|
const inputs = [
|
|
{ participantId: "known", sourceElo: null, rating: null, sourceOdds: 300, projectedWins: null, projectedTablePoints: null },
|
|
{ participantId: "longshot", sourceElo: null, rating: null, sourceOdds: 20000, projectedWins: null, projectedTablePoints: null },
|
|
{ participantId: "tail", sourceElo: null, rating: null, sourceOdds: null, projectedWins: null, projectedTablePoints: null },
|
|
];
|
|
const ratingProfile = { derivableInputs: { rating: ["sourceOdds"] } } as Pick<SimulatorManifestProfile, "derivableInputs">;
|
|
|
|
expect(resolveRatings(inputs, ratingProfile, {
|
|
inputPolicy: { ratingMin: -10, ratingMax: 35 },
|
|
}).has("tail")).toBe(false);
|
|
|
|
expect(resolveRatings(inputs, ratingProfile, {
|
|
inputPolicy: {
|
|
missingRatingStrategy: "fallbackRating",
|
|
fallbackRating: -4,
|
|
ratingMin: -10,
|
|
ratingMax: 35,
|
|
},
|
|
}).get("tail")).toMatchObject({ rating: -4, method: "fallbackRating" });
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("supports worst-known-minus rating fallback with clamping", () => {
|
|
const resolved = resolveRatings(
|
|
[
|
|
{ participantId: "favorite", sourceElo: null, rating: 30, sourceOdds: null, projectedWins: null, projectedTablePoints: null },
|
|
{ participantId: "known-tail", sourceElo: null, rating: -8, sourceOdds: null, projectedWins: null, projectedTablePoints: null },
|
|
{ participantId: "missing-tail", sourceElo: null, rating: null, sourceOdds: null, projectedWins: null, projectedTablePoints: null },
|
|
],
|
|
{ derivableInputs: { rating: ["sourceOdds"] } },
|
|
{
|
|
inputPolicy: {
|
|
missingRatingStrategy: "worstKnownMinus",
|
|
fallbackRatingDelta: 5,
|
|
ratingMin: -10,
|
|
ratingMax: 35,
|
|
},
|
|
}
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
expect(resolved.get("missing-tail")).toMatchObject({ rating: -10, method: "worstKnownMinus" });
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("blends base Elo and futures odds into a single Elo by oddsWeight", () => {
|
|
const inputs = [
|
|
{ participantId: "favorite", sourceElo: 1800, rating: null, sourceOdds: 300, projectedWins: null, projectedTablePoints: null },
|
|
{ participantId: "longshot", sourceElo: 1200, rating: null, sourceOdds: 20000, projectedWins: null, projectedTablePoints: null },
|
|
];
|
|
|
|
// oddsWeight 0: the stored base Elo wins outright.
|
|
const eloOnly = resolveSourceElos(inputs, profile, { inputPolicy: { oddsWeight: 0 } });
|
|
expect(eloOnly.get("favorite")).toMatchObject({ sourceElo: 1800, method: "direct" });
|
|
|
|
// oddsWeight 1: futures fully override the base Elo.
|
|
const oddsOnly = resolveSourceElos(inputs, profile, { inputPolicy: { oddsWeight: 1 } });
|
|
expect(oddsOnly.get("favorite")?.method).toBe("sourceOdds");
|
|
expect(oddsOnly.get("longshot")?.method).toBe("sourceOdds");
|
|
|
|
// Between: a blend that sits strictly between the base and the odds-derived Elo.
|
|
const oddsElo = oddsOnly.get("favorite")!.sourceElo;
|
|
const blended = resolveSourceElos(inputs, profile, { inputPolicy: { oddsWeight: 0.5 } });
|
|
expect(blended.get("favorite")?.method).toBe("blend");
|
|
const blendedElo = blended.get("favorite")!.sourceElo;
|
|
expect(blendedElo).toBeGreaterThan(Math.min(1800, oddsElo));
|
|
expect(blendedElo).toBeLessThan(Math.max(1800, oddsElo));
|
|
expect(blendedElo).toBeCloseTo(Math.round(0.5 * 1800 + 0.5 * oddsElo), 0);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("blends projected wins with futures odds when both are present", () => {
|
|
const inputs = [
|
|
{ participantId: "team-1", sourceElo: null, rating: null, sourceOdds: 300, projectedWins: 60, projectedTablePoints: null },
|
|
{ participantId: "team-2", sourceElo: null, rating: null, sourceOdds: 20000, projectedWins: 20, projectedTablePoints: null },
|
|
];
|
|
|
|
// oddsWeight 0: projectedWins is the base.
|
|
expect(resolveSourceElos(inputs, profile, { seasonGames: 82, inputPolicy: { oddsWeight: 0 } }).get("team-1")?.method)
|
|
.toBe("projectedWins");
|
|
|
|
// oddsWeight 1: futures override the projection.
|
|
expect(resolveSourceElos(inputs, profile, { seasonGames: 82, inputPolicy: { oddsWeight: 1 } }).get("team-1")?.method)
|
|
.toBe("sourceOdds");
|
|
|
|
// Between: blended.
|
|
expect(resolveSourceElos(inputs, profile, { seasonGames: 82, inputPolicy: { oddsWeight: 0.4 } }).get("team-1")?.method)
|
|
.toBe("blend");
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("blends a direct rating with futures odds by oddsWeight", () => {
|
|
const ratingProfile = { derivableInputs: { rating: ["sourceOdds"] } } as Pick<SimulatorManifestProfile, "derivableInputs">;
|
|
const inputs = [
|
|
{ participantId: "favorite", sourceElo: null, rating: 30, sourceOdds: 300, projectedWins: null, projectedTablePoints: null },
|
|
{ participantId: "longshot", sourceElo: null, rating: -5, sourceOdds: 20000, projectedWins: null, projectedTablePoints: null },
|
|
];
|
|
|
|
// oddsWeight 0: direct rating wins.
|
|
expect(resolveRatings(inputs, ratingProfile, { inputPolicy: { ratingMin: -10, ratingMax: 35, oddsWeight: 0 } }).get("favorite"))
|
|
.toMatchObject({ rating: 30, method: "direct" });
|
|
|
|
// oddsWeight 1: odds override the rating.
|
|
expect(
|
|
resolveRatings(inputs, ratingProfile, {
|
|
inputPolicy: { ratingMin: -10, ratingMax: 35, oddsWeight: 1 },
|
|
}).get("favorite")?.method
|
|
).toBe("sourceOdds");
|
|
|
|
// Between: blended.
|
|
expect(
|
|
resolveRatings(inputs, ratingProfile, {
|
|
inputPolicy: { ratingMin: -10, ratingMax: 35, oddsWeight: 0.5 },
|
|
}).get("favorite")?.method
|
|
).toBe("blend");
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("parses and clamps the base Elo priority and odds weight", () => {
|
|
const defaults = getSimulatorInputPolicy({});
|
|
expect(defaults.baseEloPriority).toEqual(DEFAULT_BASE_ELO_PRIORITY);
|
|
expect(defaults.oddsWeight).toBe(0.3);
|
|
|
|
// oddsWeight can be sourced from the top-level config or the input policy,
|
|
// and is clamped to [0, 1]; junk base-priority entries are dropped.
|
|
expect(getSimulatorInputPolicy({ oddsWeight: 0.6 }).oddsWeight).toBe(0.6);
|
|
expect(getSimulatorInputPolicy({ inputPolicy: { oddsWeight: 5 } }).oddsWeight).toBe(1);
|
|
expect(getSimulatorInputPolicy({ inputPolicy: { oddsWeight: -2 } }).oddsWeight).toBe(0);
|
|
expect(
|
|
getSimulatorInputPolicy({ inputPolicy: { baseEloPriority: ["projectedWins", "sourceOdds", "sourceElo"] } }).baseEloPriority
|
|
).toEqual(["projectedWins", "sourceElo"]);
|
|
// An empty/all-invalid priority falls back to the default.
|
|
expect(getSimulatorInputPolicy({ inputPolicy: { baseEloPriority: ["nope"] } }).baseEloPriority).toEqual(
|
|
DEFAULT_BASE_ELO_PRIORITY
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("uses NCAAW-style rating scale when deriving and falling back", () => {
|
|
const resolved = resolveRatings(
|
|
[
|
|
{ participantId: "favorite", sourceElo: null, rating: null, sourceOdds: 300, projectedWins: null, projectedTablePoints: null },
|
|
{ participantId: "longshot", sourceElo: null, rating: null, sourceOdds: 20000, projectedWins: null, projectedTablePoints: null },
|
|
{ participantId: "tail", sourceElo: null, rating: null, sourceOdds: null, projectedWins: null, projectedTablePoints: null },
|
|
],
|
|
{ derivableInputs: { rating: ["sourceOdds"] } },
|
|
{
|
|
inputPolicy: {
|
|
missingRatingStrategy: "worstKnownMinus",
|
|
fallbackRatingDelta: 0.05,
|
|
ratingMin: 0.15,
|
|
ratingMax: 0.99,
|
|
},
|
|
}
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
expect(resolved.get("favorite")?.rating).toBeLessThanOrEqual(0.99);
|
|
expect(resolved.get("tail")).toMatchObject({ rating: 0.15, method: "worstKnownMinus" });
|
|
});
|
|
});
|